SatoshiDice Tribute Review John Delono November 13, 2013 Dice7 Comments SatoshiDice Tribute is currently closed for maintenance. The website will open no earlier than December 15th.SatoshiDice Tribute is a “fast and fierce social dice game” from the company which acquired Satoshi Dice in 2013. The game is played inside a web browser, unlike SatoshiDice Legacy, where dice rolls take place on the blockchain.The house edge at SatoshiDice is 1.9%, which is slightly higher compared to other similar dice games, but much lower than in traditional brick-and-mortar casinos. The game is provably fair, just like the old Satoshi Dice.The SatoshiDice website has been improved significantly. When entering the website for the first time, you will be greeted with a silver face (the spirit of Satoshi), and a box to enter a payout address. After entering an address, you can start playing immediately; there is no sign-up required. There is a live chat feature, which can be used to interact with other players. There is a built-in Martingale betting button, which will lets you double your bet automatically, until you win. Also, you can watch dice rolls take place, and view your own bet statistics.One of the most unique features of the game is ‘Tribute’, which rewards the top three players with a fraction of every bet made. It is an exciting way for frequent players to be rewarded. Tribute rankings are calculated with several factors, which include the player’s total wager, and number of dice rolls made. To give players a better chance of becoming Tribute royalty, the rankings are reset daily.The rewards for Tribute are:King - 1st place: 0.1% of every wager made on SatoshiDiceLord - 2nd place: 0.05% of every wagerJester - 3rd place: 0.02% of every wagerIn addition, a new featured called ‘Moods’ has been incorporated into the game. It is not clear how it affects the game, but SatoshiDice has said that it will be more significant in the future.At the time of writing, the software on SatoshiDice Tribute is slow, and glitchy. BinaryFate, a Bitcoin Talk forum member, has said that, “I’m rather surprised that SD was valued to millions of $ worth of BTC, and they released something so buggy that needed so much “live” fixing over several days.”It appears to us that the SatoshiDice team was unprepared for the website’s launch. They are currently working on fixing the issues in the website. Click here to play on SatoshiDice Tribute now! SatoshiDice Tribute ReviewDespite the issues encountered during the website's launch, SatoshiDice Tribute looks like it has the potential to become one of the best Bitcoin dice sites. Software Customer Support Financial Security Player Traffic PromotionsProsProvably fairTribute reward systemConsSlow, and glitchy 3.0Overall ScoreReader Rating: (7 Votes) 7 Responses strong_bias November 13, 2013 Let me try to understand this.You gave 3 stars in player traffic to two other dice sites which has 1/1000000000000000000000 of the player traffic this site gets, but then you went ahead and gave this satoshidice 1.2 stars. You gave 4 or 5 stars to other dice sites which has 1 (ONE), ONLY ONE, person that can actually provide any kind of support. Satoshidice has a team for giving support, but they get 3 stars. You gave close to 2 stars for promotions here, but the promotion they are running is the largest of all the current ones, it is only losing long term to a specific faucet which cannot even prove how much it actually gave out.The software is as crap as the other ones you have ‘reviewed’, still this ones gets a much lower score (so yes, it really means “how much I like this site”). All in all, you couldn’t do worse than this. You either go and change all the other reviews or just rename this to bitcoinfriendsreviewer.PS: Who told you that slow sites that looks pretty to some are better than a good working site ? dicenow is really your friend, I see. Reply Bitcoin Reviewer November 14, 2013 I fixed the ratings for SD and other dice sites. Thank you. Reply strong_bias November 14, 2013 Replies are being manually chosen for the best of site’s reputation, good job!! Reply strong_bias November 14, 2013 Great that one went through while my long reply was not disclosed. Resuming: this is ranking among the worst reviewing sites, all details given in the hidden reply. Reply Bitcoin Reviewer November 14, 2013 Sorry, it was the Akismet spam filter. It probably was because you’re posting through TOR/some other proxy.Comments are not moderated or censored on Bitcoin Reviewer, unlike other review sites. Pyru November 17, 2013 I disagree with you strong_bias. This is the only site that’s not filled with useless filler content or obviously biased reviews. strong_bias November 18, 2013 The bias might not be obvious to you Bitcoin Reviewer and Pyru, and it might not be obvious to Bitcoin Reviewer too. The thing is that the reviews are biased due to lack of knowledge, due to supporters from other sites like dicenow (which was reviewed only because Otoh asked for it), due to the owner here liking one site over another. Leave a Reply Cancel ReplyYour email address will not be published.Name* Email* Comment
strong_bias November 13, 2013 Let me try to understand this.You gave 3 stars in player traffic to two other dice sites which has 1/1000000000000000000000 of the player traffic this site gets, but then you went ahead and gave this satoshidice 1.2 stars. You gave 4 or 5 stars to other dice sites which has 1 (ONE), ONLY ONE, person that can actually provide any kind of support. Satoshidice has a team for giving support, but they get 3 stars. You gave close to 2 stars for promotions here, but the promotion they are running is the largest of all the current ones, it is only losing long term to a specific faucet which cannot even prove how much it actually gave out.The software is as crap as the other ones you have ‘reviewed’, still this ones gets a much lower score (so yes, it really means “how much I like this site”). All in all, you couldn’t do worse than this. You either go and change all the other reviews or just rename this to bitcoinfriendsreviewer.PS: Who told you that slow sites that looks pretty to some are better than a good working site ? dicenow is really your friend, I see. Reply
strong_bias November 14, 2013 Replies are being manually chosen for the best of site’s reputation, good job!! Reply
strong_bias November 14, 2013 Great that one went through while my long reply was not disclosed. Resuming: this is ranking among the worst reviewing sites, all details given in the hidden reply. Reply
Bitcoin Reviewer November 14, 2013 Sorry, it was the Akismet spam filter. It probably was because you’re posting through TOR/some other proxy.Comments are not moderated or censored on Bitcoin Reviewer, unlike other review sites.
Pyru November 17, 2013 I disagree with you strong_bias. This is the only site that’s not filled with useless filler content or obviously biased reviews.
strong_bias November 18, 2013 The bias might not be obvious to you Bitcoin Reviewer and Pyru, and it might not be obvious to Bitcoin Reviewer too. The thing is that the reviews are biased due to lack of knowledge, due to supporters from other sites like dicenow (which was reviewed only because Otoh asked for it), due to the owner here liking one site over another.
